PDA

View Full Version : Veteran general bad?



Draken
13.04.12, 14:56
I done "witch of the swamp" 2 times, following sidv's guide. on first camp it says i wont loose any recruits and i havent. until now.
i tryed my new veteran general, and thought might as well go with 250 reqruits since i wont loose anyone.
And instead i lost 19 recruits. Bad luck or bad general?

Fadito
13.04.12, 15:03
if you attack a camp with recruits, the bandits can always hit back and will always damage you.

you have to attack the first camp with cavelary

Draken
13.04.12, 15:12
You are right.. i missread the guide. i should have sent 200 Cavalry, not recruits :P
Giving the veteran a second chance then.
thanks.

Lymond
13.04.12, 15:30
The veteran is good, but as we discovered on test there are a lot of fights where it makes no real difference because you were already winning in 1 round. It does reduce causalties a bit when a fight extends for longer, or 200 cavalry couldn't quite do the job.

DamianG
13.04.12, 17:05
having the option or ability of sending 250 troops to batle, dosen't mean nessesarilly that you have to do it.