Explorers ----> MF

[Orca45]

Is it not ridiculous that we get 3, 6 or 9 MF by an Explorer Adventure Search ?
Now we have the Rarity Provision House the MF are worthless.
An MF is below the 1 coin, and now you can better find SE then MF.

Can BB make the search quality better and the large of number MF higher ?

[PChamps]

You could use that line (Is it not ridiculous) for so many things in this game that are never going to change. By upping the amount you get per search the price will only go down even further.

[Orca45]

You could use that line (Is it not ridiculous) for so many things in this game that are never going to change. By upping the amount you get per search the price will only go down even further.

Then higher the change to get adventures

[Thrade]

If you specced your explorers that way they can be bring back 34 fragments a trip (or 17 frags and an adventure, or 2 adventures) if that's how you want to play it.
And explorers can still find adventures that you can't buy with frags. Adventure searches haven't become entirely useless, even with mf's valued as they are.

I'd also somewhat expect mf's to increase in price a bit. Some people would have just been using up excess science mats which will deplete, and less people will do searches that will also take away from the pool.

[Dorotheus]

Then higher the change to get adventures

Every time they add new adventures the chance of finding what was there before has to go down.

[Nogbad2]

Speaking of which Doro, has anybody yet had their explorers come home with the Sleepy Reef or Volcano ones?
15 explorers a day, and never yet seen one of them. Even the guides section seems unbothered by them, unless you go back to some earlier maps made from the bug server version.

[Mannerheim]

Speaking of which Doro, has anybody yet had their explorers come home with the Sleepy Reef or Volcano ones?
15 explorers a day, and never yet seen one of them. Even the guides section seems unbothered by them, unless you go back to some earlier maps made from the bug server version.

They were gem only from day one and AFAIK people complained about this at the test server before they went to live but nothing was done.

[Dorotheus]

Speaking of which Doro, has anybody yet had their explorers come home with the Sleepy Reef or Volcano ones?
15 explorers a day, and never yet seen one of them. Even the guides section seems unbothered by them, unless you go back to some earlier maps made from the bug server version.

Far as I know they are gem only. I would even go as far as to hold them up as a marketing disaster. BB should have asked themselves is there more tempting stuff in the shop, to which the answer is yes. The sort of players these sort of adventures are aimed at have more important things to spend their gems on. Unless BB make them obtainable by other means these adventures will be even less popular than SOTV.

[Lord_Matata]

Unless BB make them obtainable by other means these adventures will be even less popular than SOTV.

WOW that is saying a lot just on it's own

[Nogbad]

They were gem only from day one and AFAIK people complained about this at the test server before they went to live but nothing was done.

Now why doesn't that surprise me?
Thanks, at least that much is cleared up (until of course they become the de facto Guild Quest).

I quite like SotV, just never get the time to do it, maybe that will change when the constant demand to do low value advs for GQ finally gets realistic.