why to fix the bookbinder system but not the barracks system ?

[chicken35]

why to fix the bookbinder system but not the barracks system ? we could have wait for the bookbinder, but we can t wait anymore for the barracks system ,fix this awfull barracks please

[Gerontius]

Don't agree that bookbinder has been fixed. If anything, it's moderately worse...

[Dragavon]

Don't agree that bookbinder has been fixed. If anything, it's moderately worse...

This.

[Steve1077]

In what way has it been fixed?

[EctoRune]

I don't understand why people think the bookbinder got worse. We can see what the next books will cost while producing books now, isn't that a step forward?

[Splotch]

I don't understand why people think the bookbinder got worse. We can see what the next books will cost while producing books now, isn't that a step forward?

I'd say it's a step but it lacks a specific direction.

[EctoRune]

I'd say it's a step but it lacks a specific direction.

You don't think being able to see the cost of the next book is better than being unable to do so?

[Gerontius]

Would prefer costs of each book being visible in one screen as before. It only obviously sucks because BB showed they know how to do it properly with the improvements to the collectible buff making interface

[Splotch]

You don't think being able to see the cost of the next book is better than being unable to do so?

I think that being able to see it, for me at least, is completely pointless and therefore in my eyes it's a waste of time when there are more obvious enhancements that could have been done. Adding a queue so the building didn't have a nasty chunk of downtime that renders buffing pretty pointless or, at best, inconvenient would have been a step in the right direction.

I almost always have enough to cover the cost of my next book without checking and if I don't, because I'm making a higher end book and I ran out of something, I always have enough for the lowest level book and so I can just stick one of those on there instead while I switch on a few buildings for a bit to get together what I need.

As I said, it's a step but it lacks direction - I guess if it's a pre-requisite to a queue then it's in the right direction but then again I can't really see any need to roll that kind of change out in stages when the impact of this change is purely cosmetic.

[SmurfAsH]

I guess if it's a pre-requisite to a queue then it's in the right direction but then again I can't really see any need to roll that kind of change out in stages when the impact of this change is purely cosmetic.
You don't?
I prefer changes in stages like this than bugs swarming over (like too much other things implemented)..

[Steve1077]

I just want a queue added, I don't care what the next book costs

[Duong_TonThat]

I just want a queue added, I don't care what the next book costs

agree

[topgearfan]

anyone who has been interested in prod books has costs maxed anyway

[Splotch]

You don't?
I prefer changes in stages like this than bugs swarming over (like too much other things implemented)..

Changes in stages are fine but when the impact of a change is purely cosmetic, as it is in this case, you would hope that the comsetic change, as something that changes presentation rather than functionality, wouldn't be the cause of any bugs and therefore rolling it out in stages is pointless.

[Duong_TonThat]

anyone who has been interested in prod books has costs maxed anyway

what happen before that u can't see and have to wait for 12-18 hrs to see the cost. but most of the player dont care, bc if the cost is higher then they just produce more recourse or buy it.

Most of us want it can be queue so we can use glue more effectively