PDA

View Full Version : Simulator updated for new generals



FastSimTSOmaps
11.12.16, 12:01
Hi, I have updated my simulator http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?LangCode=2 to support the new generals.

Best regards.

Thejollyone
11.12.16, 14:41
this is much appreciated, as always :) thank you

vigabrand
11.12.16, 16:15
+1 :)

ChapterIX
13.12.16, 10:13
Nusala seems to simulate with 160 and not 165 when I tried It out. Did anybody else see that? Also, Vargus protecting vulnerable targets.. During some suggested attacks I was surprised at what was being suggested. Is it working 100%?

Horseback 170 recruits +10 Crossbowman for example.. It's reporting losses of weaker targets.

Other that that, it's encouraging :) - nice work!

WanaBSettler
13.12.16, 10:27
cool stuff thanx for the hard work!!

sk_setttler
01.01.17, 11:45
I think there is something wrong with Vargus implementation in Combat Sim.

Please check this results:

http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?MapaID=77&LangCode=2&s=1&G_1_213=1&T_1_146=40&T_1_149=80&T_1_148=60&E_1_135=80&E_1_138=80

vs.

http://www.thesettlersonlinewiki.com/combat-sim?simref=EDa3yB

FastSimTSOmaps
01.01.17, 13:22
I think there is something wrong with Vargus implementation in Combat Sim.

Please check this results:

http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?MapaID=77&LangCode=2&s=1&G_1_213=1&T_1_146=40&T_1_149=80&T_1_148=60&E_1_135=80&E_1_138=80

vs.

http://www.thesettlersonlinewiki.com/combat-sim?simref=EDa3yB

Fixed, thanks for the advice.

Elldar
01.01.17, 19:26
Hi, when I ran this simulation for Vargus http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?MapaID=24&LangCode=2&s=1&G_1_213=1&T_1_69=56&T_1_73=1&T_1_51=79&T_1_79=44&E_1_7=60&E_1_72=60&E_1_55=60&E_1_35=10

However, my result when trying was 56R+40C losses. I think the attack order of Vargus and the cavs you have, are wrong. I believe Vargus attack first then your cavs in the simulator, however when watching the attack replay, you see that your cav attack before Vargus. This would only make a difference, on this camp where Vargus actually hit the weaker target (opponents cav) first.

# For clarification - I want to make myself perfectly clear.
How it looks like in replay, with Vargus 60C+.. , 60E + 60LB + 60C +10K camp on bk:
First strike 1 - Your cavs hits opponents cavs (killing them all),
First strike 2 - Vargus hits opponents elites
First strike 3 - opponents cavs hits your recruit (intercept ability from Vargus)
...

In the sim, with just 60 cavs it look likes this: http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?MapaID=24&LangCode=2&s=1&G_1_213=1&T_1_51=60&E_1_7=60&E_1_72=60&E_1_55=60&E_1_35=10

The only reason I think that one would get this result is if:
First strike 1 - Vargus attacks opponents cavs + splash on elites
First strike 2 - Your cavs attacks opponents LB (no cavs left)
First strike 3 - Opponent cavs hit your cav (since I made an 60c attack only...)
...

I hope it got more explicit with this clarification. Thanks in advance and keep up the good work.

FastSimTSOmaps
01.01.17, 22:36
i will take a look tomorrow in the morning, best regards and happy new year ;)

FastSimTSOmaps
02.01.17, 11:13
I have added a Combat Log to the results, now you can check the combat fully :). I will check what you say but yes in my sim vargus attacks first. In this case i would need to change the combat order. Probably also for MMA (I will check all generals).

Best regards.


Hi, when I ran this simulation for Vargus http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?MapaID=24&LangCode=2&s=1&G_1_213=1&T_1_69=56&T_1_73=1&T_1_51=79&T_1_79=44&E_1_7=60&E_1_72=60&E_1_55=60&E_1_35=10

However, my result when trying was 56R+40C losses. I think the attack order of Vargus and the cavs you have, are wrong. I believe Vargus attack first then your cavs in the simulator, however when watching the attack replay, you see that your cav attack before Vargus. This would only make a difference, on this camp where Vargus actually hit the weaker target (opponents cav) first.

# For clarification - I want to make myself perfectly clear.
How it looks like in replay, with Vargus 60C+.. , 60E + 60LB + 60C +10K camp on bk:
First strike 1 - Your cavs hits opponents cavs (killing them all),
First strike 2 - Vargus hits opponents elites
First strike 3 - opponents cavs hits your recruit (intercept ability from Vargus)
...

In the sim, with just 60 cavs it look likes this: http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?MapaID=24&LangCode=2&s=1&G_1_213=1&T_1_51=60&E_1_7=60&E_1_72=60&E_1_55=60&E_1_35=10

The only reason I think that one would get this result is if:
First strike 1 - Vargus attacks opponents cavs + splash on elites
First strike 2 - Your cavs attacks opponents LB (no cavs left)
First strike 3 - Opponent cavs hit your cav (since I made an 60c attack only...)
...

I hope it got more explicit with this clarification. Thanks in advance and keep up the good work.

FastSimTSOmaps
03.01.17, 09:11
Ok problem fixed, the problem was that generals attacked always before the rest of troops and they are always the last :). It happened with other generals too, but it is more important with the new generals because it changes the results.

technically It was a simple "order by" in a mysql search that was ASC instead of DESC :P.

Thanks for the advices

Glux
23.06.17, 22:23
settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?MapaID=76&LangCode=2&G_1_102=1&Gl_1=924723&Gh_1=1068&oi=1&T_1_39=280&E_1_137=200#Gl_1=924723&Gh_1=1068

Thank you for the great work on this combat simulator.

I would just like to clarify the above. It's a heavy units vs. heavy units battle. Given that both are last-strike, I assume that mine would attack first, and kill all of the opposing heavy units. The Combat Log shows this is the case, but it shows that enemy heavy units attack me (from the grave, somehow) after that.
Can anyone please explain the combat mechanics for this type of scenario? I'm not sure if it's an error with the simulator, and I think we can understand why I wouldn't want to try it to find out.

SSSecretSquirrel
24.06.17, 11:36
Units with the same initiative are all able to attack. Combat log doesnt show the attacks simultaneously.