expeditions buffs to drop with lucky explorer search + Artefact search

[TheVictorious]

I think it is a good idea to replace some really useless buffs with a chance to drop some expedition buffs, like overdrive and boot camp, or maybe new buffs.

The buffs somehow can be dropped from lucky explorer searches as a bonus with search, or/and Artefact search buffs!

[Larili]

-1 Useless buffs are annoying after all those books, but if you want PVP stuff a better suggestion is make a pvp explorer available for those that want one ( Trade in a marshal). Putting pvp buffs in main game searches would just be adding insult to injury for those of us who want nothing to do with that side of the game.

[amazola]

+1

[queen-vicious]

-1 i don't do pvp, never will, those buffs would be even more useless to players like me

[TheVictorious]

-1 Useless buffs are annoying after all those books, but if you want PVP stuff a better suggestion is make a pvp explorer available for those that want one ( Trade in a marshal). Putting pvp buffs in main game searches would just be adding insult to injury for those of us who want nothing to do with that side of the game.


-1 i don't do pvp, never will, those buffs would be even more useless to players like me

Sell them in TO, i'll be happy to buy them :)

Also read again, I meant to replace those so "useless buffs" with "less useless buffs", like the cheese sandwich or Aunt Irma baskets with those PvP buffs.

BTW, PvP is really fun, not worth, but you can have fun :)

if don't play PvP another people do :)

[Larili]

I appreciate pvp is liked by some, TheV. But not as many that play the main game, therefore the maths does not add up. Having the number of useless pvp buffs would soon over supply the limited market which would make them not only useless but irritatingly annoying as they would not sell, let alone the extra clicking involved to try and sell them. I actually use all those useless buffs at some time so they are not very useful but usable which is more than I can see any pvp buff ever being. Just thinking about it more forces me to add another -1, so now its a -2 from me Lol

[TheVictorious]

I appreciate pvp is liked by some, TheV. But not as many that play the main game, therefore the maths does not add up. Having the number of useless pvp buffs would soon over supply the limited market which would make them not only useless but irritatingly annoying as they would not sell, let alone the extra clicking involved to try and sell them. I actually use all those useless buffs at some time so they are not very useful but usable which is more than I can see any pvp buff ever being. Just thinking about it more forces me to add another -1, so now its a -2 from me Lol

Personally, I buy those buffs, and it is just 2 buffs, that you properly already have 1 or 2 of them, stack-able buffs make this not really bad.

Adding 1 info, even if you don't like PvP for level 70 you have to play it a lot if you want to complete all pathfinder quests :)

[Larili]

Personally, I buy those buffs, and it is just 2 buffs, that you properly already have 1 or 2 of them, stack-able buffs make this not really bad.

Adding 1 info, even if you don't like PvP for level 70 you have to play it a lot if you want to complete all pathfinder quests :)

Lol -3 now TheV. By the time I get to lvl 70 BB had better change that then or I'm going to be even more irritated with PVP quests lurking once again in my quest book! Hear that Devs, alternative quest chain required for pathfinder or Larili will be on your case, `optional' means optional and you won't be allowed to forget it ! Lmao

[TheVictorious]

Lol -3 now TheV. By the time I get to lvl 70 BB had better change that then or I'm going to be even more irritated with PVP quests lurking once again in my quest book! Hear that Devs, alternative quest chain required for pathfinder or Larili will be on your case, `optional' means optional and you won't be allowed to forget it ! Lmao

even if you make -100 it is still -1 count user against idea or +1 if user with idea, not really funny reply, I'm trying to clarify things not making jokes here.
Also, if you disagree with something I said, it has nothing to do with the original post!

Finally, I don't count on something on the future, if you have resource about what you are saying then give me it, FACT saying the game is not for you only, if you still away from level 70, a lot of players entering this zone, as I know in my friend list 2 players are lvl 70+ , and like 4 players level 69.

The PvP enhancements requested from ages and still BB did nothing, even the small bugs still not fixed yet!
But another fact saying, the optional is to complete all pathfinder quests, but it is Mandatory to play PvP "if" you want to get full rewards not partial!
the quests optional, and always optional, but it is your choice to play and finish them or not!

Again, The whole idea you discuss now, is to play PvP or not, my suggestion just straight forward, is to replace "already" useless buffs with another "less useless" since some players want them! if you don't play PvP it is just you, or a few, or major players, but fore sure not all players not playing it, for me, I really having fun playing it, almost 5 times weekly, before events, I was playing it more than the adventures! worthless, yes, costly, yes, a lot of bugs and lag, yes, but so much fun :)

It is your right to say -1 and +1, but not your right to make fun on my clarification, I'm really serious, this is suggestion forum not community chit chat!

[Larili]

Then seriously, my counter points ( said happily ) are also valid. I would not want my usable buffs replaced by useless ones. Your asking for main game buffs to be replaced with pvp specific buffs, and I suggested and firmly believe that pvp content should be kept within the pvp context, and make them available through playing pvp only. Those that like pvp will then get more of what they want, and those of us that want no part of it won't get further annoyed.

[TheVictorious]

Then seriously, my counter points ( said happily ) are also valid. I would not want my usable buffs replaced by useless ones. Your asking for main game buffs to be replaced with pvp specific buffs, and I suggested and firmly believe that pvp content should be kept within the pvp context, and make them available through playing pvp only. Those that like pvp will then get more of what they want, and those of us that want no part of it won't get further annoyed.

OMG, please understand what I'm saying, I can't believe that I still need to repeat for my 3rd time?, I'm not meaning to replace all buffs to be a pvp buffs, just a chance to drop some pvp buffs as well, replace cheese sandwich, and Aunt Irmas Basket , solid sandwich (maybe lower chances for Helpful scarecrow and Whips and Carrots buffs as well?),
Why I said replace not just add those? to avoid the chances to drop the chances to get another usable buffs like rainbows and Myers.

In so simple way, to replace useless buffs in drop from drop grid with 2 pvp buffs, not stop your "usable buffs" or even lower the chances to drop them.

Finally, PvP is a part of game, optional, but you still got quests for it, achievements for it, and even a market for it! also pvp buffs not buffs are used inside expedition, it is to boost the production of the buildings that you have in your island, like farms, mills, Major House, mines, ... etc

[Dorotheus]

It's irrelevant in this case what other players think, first you have to make a convincing case to the developers and hope other players will support you. All games have one thing in common, you have to have the chance to lose as well as a chance to win. What you are asking for is for the the developers to replace the chance to lose with a certain win. Unless you incorporate a chance to lose into your suggestion I can't see the developers buying your idea as one worth looking into.

[TheVictorious]

It's irrelevant in this case what other players think, first you have to make a convincing case to the developers and hope other players will support you. All games have one thing in common, you have to have the chance to lose as well as a chance to win. What you are asking for is for the the developers to replace the chance to lose with a certain win. Unless you incorporate a chance to lose into your suggestion I can't see the developers buying your idea as one worth looking into.

Agree with you, but my discussion is just to clarify things, I do not really think developers will make any efforts in expedition as seems they are in lowest priority now :(

But not bad idea to make a suggestion, also, to clarify it to avoid any misunderstand.