Results of "First Aid" not shown in combat report

[t00tie]

I have "first aid" skil on several generals. The skill works and even rounds up the savings but it is not shown in the battle report.

http://i.imgur.com/vWyGq9T.jpg

Here on ywc last camp Vargus attacked with 27ms and lost 26ms. He has 3 books on First Aid saving 9%. 9% of 26ms is rounded up to three ms plus the 1ms he didn't lose so he should have 4ms loaded which he does as shown in my star menu:

http://i.imgur.com/F8YMrhg.jpg

It would be nice if the combat report showed how many units were saved by First Aid.

On a side note I love the new combat report emails, could we get a summary for the enemy army too please?

[BB_Saqui]

Thanks for this. If anyone else runs into something similar, please report it in this thread (screenshots are a bonus!).

[Fuseboy]

Saqui, everyone runs into this. They're just asking for a change to the combat report emails to show how many troops were saved by first aid, because the current combat report shows first aid was used, but doesn't show the number resurrected, only the number lost before first aid.

I don't mind not knowing, and I wouldn't classify it as a problem, but that's just me. I actually like knowing the actual losses before first aid, and I would really be disappointed if that was taken away.

I just look at the numbers and think, "Ok, lost a bit less than that." Not a big deal, but might be nice enhancement.

[BB_Saqui]

I'll be certain to forward this across - thanks for the feedback. :)

[Thejollyone]

Saqui, everyone runs into this. They're just asking for a change to the combat report emails to show how many troops were saved by first aid, because the current combat report shows first aid was used, but doesn't show the number resurrected, only the number lost before first aid.

I don't mind not knowing, and I wouldn't classify it as a problem, but that's just me. I actually like knowing the actual losses before first aid, and I would really be disappointed if that was taken away.

I just look at the numbers and think, "Ok, lost a bit less than that." Not a big deal, but might be nice enhancement.

I second this - cheers