Guild quests AND daily quests are stupid imo.
To many of them cost more to complete then what you get back.
Atleast they should have given a small amount of xp for people that aint 50 yet, and a few star coins for the level 50.
Maybe then they would actually be worth doing daily...
I voted the 3º option, I don´t do them because:
1. As OP said gc are cheap, if I need them (almost never i do), I can buy them with gc.
2. Quests are just to boring because they repeat themselfs.
3. If a player spends real money to buy deerhuts or get them with other resources for 1 less refill, then why there´s that annoying meat refill?
The way GQ are running now, they are "good" for low level players, not high levels. Same for dailys, if i´m lvl50 why do I need to make a quest to get 10 wood!? The more active players, the ones that do them everyday, should have more compensation, maybe the first day you´ll get 100ggc, then 120, 140, and so on.
Maybe with the new guild features things will change regarding guild coins.
Option 1 we have in our guild.
When people need help, we will give it.
I voted 2, "only do easy and profitable GQ". Although I try to finish all of them, I don't see the value in doing some of them and finish them just to reach the overall guild quest goal. If its teamwork, that can be achieved within a guild by sharing resources to complete adventures , upgrade your island, improve specialists etc. GQ does not have to be easy it just has to be worth doing. One solution I see is to put on a constant basis worthwhile items in the merchant's guild section. If there are silos, watermills and other useful items priced below TO price, that would give guild coins a higher value and thus provide a good incentive to gather as much guild coins as possible.
I am an officer of a guild and we always do our GQ's, due to this quiet a few of our members have been able to acquire things that due to not buying gems they would be unable to. We do help those that are having trouble or dont have the resources to complete their GQ and find this to work extremely well. No one seems to complain about doing it, so I dont see why we should vote to get it taken out.