I would say a improved fish farm is a very long way in the future.
Printable View
I would say a improved fish farm is a very long way in the future.
I'm sure lots of people thought that about silo's and water mills too but we got them anyway. since there are too many licenses in game & with the improved butcher just added the next target will likely be a fairly cheap licence free buildings probably the deerstalker first then the fish farm. I'm betting we have both by this time next year 1 at xmas & 1 at easter but we'll just have to wait n see if they prove me wrong :)
I hope not, there are plenty of built buildings still of which there is no gem brought version. Bakers & flour mills, the various smelters and weapons smiths. I presume which ever comes next will be what is likely to put as much of our cash into their bank accounts.
These UI changes would be so super awesome, please BB hire this guy :D
Very much agreed. I can't have an opinion about the epic woodyard and the beanstalks, but please make (at least most of) these suggestions happen!
Concerning the fish buff, it woud be very welcome, but it's way too cheap. Maybe for 4-5k fish would be more realistic.
++++++++
Omg! We want all of it. If you work at BB it would be good for us :)
I don't recall giving you permission to speak for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretenza
the nr 1!!, love the most, - cant handle when i make a mistake and and loose maeby 100 es order like 3-4 units, and the next camp need the 100 es, but have to cancel 160 x 25 , and every time i have to w8 5-10 sek to the barrack is refreshing and its around 20 min of just pressing on a x.. and when thats done u have to re-order the units again,
1 do like the image
2 change amount from 25 order, to 100 each order, or from 1-unlimet ( the users own fault if order to ment at once)
3 do it like the settler game rise of an empire, prio the working order, like u can chose what units it have to produce first, and when reach 0 of that thing, i would produce next kinda unit
like if u order 5000 R and 5000 B , and 2000 C and then u figure out that u need some of the B and then C before the Recruit, u just prio, the B and C before R and then change back to prio R again when u need R again, then u just can keep the production up without think abour what to produce but allways have some in order ;) and in that case u can order more unit than u have the settlers for, and the "out of settler" mark come out of ur barrack when need settler, like u can pre-order the unit befor u can erford it, or like when u got no more BS and got more bows + settlers and bows are in prio 2 it would start produce bow units
YEEES! we need everything!
Nice work.
Extra +'s for 1, 10 and 11.
number 1 and 13 are badly urgent. serious :p
all the others would make the game a lot more easygoing and not rusty as it feels today
"New items: Improved Deerstalker - Building" from halloween sneak peak :P... Takes a bow lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Smiffy2204
said it before, but....
we still need to have the population buildings and relevant info added to the economy tab so we can find those buildings that still need upgrading etc
+1 for all pls!
I do like all the ideas proposed and no doubt some will be implemented by BB asap - well done for the well laid-out proposals.
99% of the writers tend to agree with you too - btw who is the 1% :P
Raise's hand, me.
It is quite clearly stated that the developers want one idea per thread, and that they rarely if ever read threads containing multiple ideas. I can see where they are coming from as it does not give the chance to gauge how wanted each individual idea is by the player-base. Then there is the problem where the OP added ideas to the original post which gives the false idea that players who agreed with the original post also agree with the later additions even if they had not re-visited the thread since they posted.
+1 from me
You've hit the nail on the head here. At the end of that day the developers need statistics to be able to clearly see where their resources need to go - after all there's only a limited amount of it. These threads are great at face value, but it would be infinitely more useful if each singular suggestion was in its own thread. These threads can then be used to gauge player feedback, how much they want it, why they want it, maybe even different takes on that suggestion. Threads with dozens of suggestions make it hard to discern all of this information.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorotheus
We implore everyone who has a suggestion to first search the forums to see if it's already been submitted (and add a post if that's the case). If they can't find it, they can then start a new thread to invite public discussion. The more active the thread (+1's tell us hardly anything by the way), the more information the developers can get from it.
oh... wow...
You may be new to this game, but we and the forum are not. I suggest YOU take time to look through the hundreds of threads/items, or employ a someone new to do so as, if there has never been a database for them in the past, that is pretty shameful on BBs behalf.
Even your faithful MODS have tried to keep the suggestions together by merging them within the forum where they can.
Your response just goes to show how much our suggestions have really been taken notice of in the past..
Smiffy,
In light of the above note from BB could you please start 23 different threads so that we may all properly have our say about your brilliant ideas. Many thanks for your hard work.
Mort
PS please dont forget to add the original date that you made each suggestion. Many thanks
innit ^^ lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Mortallicus
Most of the ideas here were collected by Smiffy from original seperate threads, which in general, he has linked in the opening post. The graphics are original, but not necessarily the ideas :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mortallicus
Thanks Houri
So does that mean this thread should have been merged 23 times with the older separate ones? I am getting a bit confused now :D
tell me about it.... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Mortallicus
ok said it before but i'll say it again i started this thread with the aim of listing good suggestions made by not just myself but all who use the forums in an overview (something bb should've done a long time ago) I even did it with pictures so it would be clearer. it was started BEFORE the posting guidelines got put up and had UNFINISHED MORE TO COME on the original post right from the start. with 3k+ threads in this part of the forum searching is unpractical and in most cases doesn't happen.
also to the "1%" who object to this thread don't worry i stopped adding to it ages ago as it was a waste of my time but i will point out that i see u complain, pick holes or just plain invent reasons not to like almost everything, but yet u never seem to have any good ideas of your own to contribute... funny that!
Thanks Smiffy for the explanation. I think they are really good suggestions so if they were made before individually and ignored by BB, and then grouped and ignored again I think its nothing to do with the suggestions taking too much time for BB to read. Even grouped together it only takes a few moments. BB should then perhaps give a brief response as to why they cannot even consider an idea before we all waste so much of our time making comments + or - . But apparently only their time is at a premium.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smiffy2204
With regard to the few unhelpful negative comments, they are often the same people on just about every thread so just ignore them.
We do understand that you would like to see more response to suggestions, but unfortunately, it's not as straightforward as you may think. Ravel did previously give an explanation as to why it is not currently possible for feedback to be given on all suggestions.
I just think it cant be that difficult to tell us what you know for sure you cant do. Must be some you can discount immediately and we do understand that BB have to prioritise as well. I have seen the explanations :)
I am sure its frustrating coming up with ideas , putting a lot of time into the graphics etc to hear nothing ever at all. Some of these threads have been going on for 4 years with no response. Im sure we would accept a +1 from BB occasionally even if they do not like ours :D We do realise it would then take time and may not come to fruition like the guild bank (whistles....) :D
We still need most of this BB. Especially "Send to top" in barracks queues.
Fantastic ideas.
Would Love these to be implemented. :)
some excellent ideas -shame to see so little done about it.
love it all great ideas
I'd like to add onto this list the more and more urgent need for better explorer management. Like the geo suggestion here, we need to be able to do a select all and send at the same time rather than going through them 1 by 1. People who want to do that can still do so, but the only thing I do is send every one of them on the longest adventure search and it's becoming very tedious with so many explorers now available.
When they come back with loot we also need to be able to just see everything in 1 place and collect the lot in 1 click, rather than having to go through each mail individually. I've got 4 pages of explorer loot mails now from the past 4 or 5 days and I just can't be bothered to collect them 1 at a time any longer.
One change I would make to the geo interface you have shown here is the number of geos shown in the list is too small. The geo/explorer section should be quite a lot bigger with the skill tree shown as a mouse over pop up or something because most of the time it's just not that important. I don't care what skill they have, I just want to send all my fast geos out for granite etc most of the time. If you want to send them individually because you have 1 special one, you can just do that using the current method of sending them out
I implore you to make a new thread about this suggestion if one doesn't already exist. Discussing multiple suggestions in a single thread makes it hard for us to discern feedback. For this reason, I'm locking this thread - if you wish to discuss the suggestions in the original post further, please head to the original thread that's linked beside each on under the "spoiler button".Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazgod