What type of PVP would you like

[Bluntoze]

Basically non PVP people just don't want to get attacked and lose their territory. But i don't think they would mind if they would get involved as traders in the PVP world. With the system i described they would always be represented in the PVP map trough his exit point in the map. The player chooses if he wants to expand and get involved in the fight for influence and land , or just stay back and enjoy politics and trade. And why not mix both , you could have someone give you military support ,trough good politics and trade agreements, and still be able to expand as a merchant.

[Brent]

I'm not sure what 'arena' actually means. I mean a persistent world in which the gains of the previous day, week or year stay on the map as exploitable land.

[Brent]

This 'arena' should be a persistent ingame world in which territory is capturable and exploitable on a permanent basis. I agree with bluntzone's point about travel time needing to be long...probably the same as it is now.

The person attacked should get immediate warning about the attack the minute it set's off. The opportunity to get reinforcements from other players should be possible.

[Jaimy]

And guild PvP? That also would be awesome, handling tactics with guild and having huge battles + rivals

[Bluntoze]

The whole idea is based on guild PVP and guild Occupied territory. A guild occupied territory would be made out of each guild member's territory and all guild members or members of an allied guild could travel on it.

[Brent]

inter guild wars would be great. bb have announced that they are working on a pvp element.

[Bluntoze]

bump

[Ric666]

Only problem with introducing PvP into this type of game, is the people who buy gems will get a significant eco. advantage over those who don't, allowing them to retrain armies much quicker.

It adds immediate imbalance.

I do support PvP, just needs to be done very carefully so not to ruin what is already a very fun game without it.

[marlock]

If Blue Byte decide to implement PvP, they will need to design a system to please the PvP crowd and not alienate the non-PvP crowd at the same time.
The best solution would be an arena open to consensual participants as an optional extra and the rewards should be beneficial to the PvP and arena only.

i have heard a couple rumors... as ive posted in other threads ... that an arena system is soundling like what they are going to implement.... but im not certain on that

[Elsteveo]

Can't wait for PvP, in my opinion it will greatly improve the game for me personally