Closed Thread
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 95

Thread: Proof the German servers (and possibly others) HAVE used an exploit in EOTW

  1. #11
    Skilled Student
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    20
    World
    Newfoundland
    I really really hope this is not the situation and at the very least we should recieve a full report into this not just a ( no you are wrong response )

  2. #12
    Forum Explorer
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    105
    World
    Newfoundland
    Exploit or not, somethings wrong when one server takes such a strong lead from the start (followed by to other older servers)

  3. #13
    Pathfinder
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1
    World
    Newfoundland
    also only German and Polish servers are in the top 15, non of the difrent nations servers pass the 100%

  4. #14
    Original Serf
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Vilnius
    Posts
    6
    World
    Newfoundland
    we don't have any information on how populated are servers here in TSO, but it can't be possible 2-3 realms can complete the objectives easily fast and other servers (majority) are left behind by a mile. Definately somethings up, would be nice to see official statement either way.

  5. #15
    Pathfinder
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2
    World
    Newfoundland
    If this is no fixed myself and most players will leave.

    Cheating is wrong and they should be punished for it, can clearly see who is cheating and who is not.

  6. #16
    Original Serf
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    6
    World
    Newfoundland
    so why BB no adjourn stat? if old players are more strong and do more adventure , why german server 1 no is first on all ? for german server 6.... from 100% at 150% in a day. is a fact.

    all clues bring in in same direction....

    Elementary dr. Watson

  7. #17
    Ruler of the Land peck_ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,147
    World
    Newfoundland
    If you were BB, what would you do to fix this? I imagine they don't actually have granular enough detail to see who has and hasn't done 100% (if this actually exists of course). So you can't just punish the "cheaters"

    Start it again, have everyone who put everything in have their efforts wiped out?
    Give everyone the 200% reward? So those who tried less get it anyway?
    Give everyone 100%? So the servers who managed to break 150% get less?

    Be tricky to be in their shoes right now.

  8. #18
    Forum Explorer
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    105
    World
    Newfoundland
    If that's true then i'd like to know how they've fully completed so many (Forgot to post the one I was replying ot - Icegirls comment that BB posted on the German forum that only completed adventures will count)

  9. #19
    Pathfinder
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    5
    World
    Newfoundland
    Quote Originally Posted by peck_ed View Post
    If you were BB, what would you do to fix this? ... Be tricky to be in their shoes right now.
    Firstly, an apology would be nice.

    Secondly, a forum poll asking all players of all servers to vote on how to proceed from here might restore some faith amongst players.

    Suggested options :

    a) Restore servers back to the point where we were before the event started
    b) Give everyone 200%
    c) Cancel the event and play Scrooge

  10. #20
    Glorious Graduate
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    83
    World
    Sandycove
    While it's possible that there's some dodge that has allowed older more populated servers (those not in beta too) to leap ahead i just think it's so much more likely that the event was just skewed in their favour from the start.

    I know there was some statement about balancing going on with the results but never actually defining what the balancing system was... and, if as it seem, the balancing actually makes no difference when the adventure prohibits lower level players and big surprise when the newest servers are at the bottom.. the mid-aged ones in the middle and the original ones at the top.

    All in all it was an ok idea, poorly implemented, created mistrust and unhappiness in the players who could take part and disappointment in those who can't due to level and crappy rewards.

    I also love how the leaderboard actually backfired.. it was supposed to help and encourage participation.. instead once we saw how far behind we were in the first 24 hours a lot of people just gave up and after a few days those left worked out how unlikely we were to even reach 100% it declined even more.

Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Rummor about EOTW exploit.
    By Exoul in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 14.12.12, 20:38
  2. Buff exploit
    By EternalPink in forum Bugs & Technical Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03.10.12, 18:24
  3. parrot exploit
    By dorkan in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18.09.12, 08:36

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Ubisoft uses cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our websites. By continuing to use this site you agree to accept these cookies. More info on our privacy.