Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: more landing spots

  1. #1
    Architect of the Empire
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    973
    World
    Sandycove

    more landing spots

    With the Easter event soon upon us would it be possible to get some more landing spots on our home Island. As it stands already generals go into star menu unless I'm careful but they definitely will with 3 more.

  2. #2
    Ruler of the Land
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,563
    World
    Newfoundland
    I guess they want us to get a Quartermaster General to send all troops and then send all fighting generals empty (without leaving star menu).
    25/11-14 , 23/02-16 .. The end is coming and it will look like this .

  3. #3
    Treasure Hunter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    230
    World
    Northisle
    I'd go the opposite way, no landing spots. Generals should just stay in the star menu and be manageable from there. You should be able to assign troops and send them straight off to an adventure from the star menu. People now potentially have the 6 slow gens, 3 vets, MMA, quartermaster (seen people with 2 of these), MG, several BHGs and a couple of grims. Wouldn't be surprised if some people had close to 20 generals now. What's the point in them landing at all?

  4. #4
    Skilled Student
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    45
    World
    Newfoundland
    Even better introduce a new building 'the garrison' so you can put your generals in there.

  5. #5
    Battle Hardened Contributor
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    356
    World
    Northisle
    +1

  6. #6
    Ruler of the Land
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Milky Way
    Posts
    2,854
    World
    Sandycove
    Adding more spots is not a solution to this problem, given time this problem will appear again. A better solution would be that the generals just head back to where their garrison was before being sent on an adventure. This would give you the flexibility of having your generals where you want on your island.
    When it comes to Gene pools and shallow ends they can be found at the bar drinking pina colada's

  7. #7
    Original Serf
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    18
    World
    Newfoundland
    just a bigger island would do, the size hasn't evolved with the game

  8. #8
    Ruler of the Land Thejollyone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    in absentia
    Posts
    2,072
    World
    Sandycove
    Quote Originally Posted by Hazgod View Post
    I'd go the opposite way, no landing spots. Generals should just stay in the star menu and be manageable from there. You should be able to assign troops and send them straight off to an adventure from the star menu. People now potentially have the 6 slow gens, 3 vets, MMA, quartermaster (seen people with 2 of these), MG, several BHGs and a couple of grims. Wouldn't be surprised if some people had close to 20 generals now. What's the point in them landing at all?
    +1 And while we're at it, can we get rid of the annoying de-camp/reassemble camp each time you move the gens on an adv?

Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. New landing zones on RB
    By Wu-L in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22.07.15, 23:59
  2. Default landing positions QM
    By Bluesavanah in forum Game Suggestions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 30.03.15, 18:40
  3. New Bug, generals, landing in Adv LZ.
    By Deorum in forum Bugs & Technical Issues
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10.03.15, 20:36
  4. Old Friends Landing zone
    By natalijar in forum Bugs & Technical Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11.01.15, 18:09
  5. New landing zones - Good or bad?
    By Faffner in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 14.03.14, 01:04

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Ubisoft uses cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our websites. By continuing to use this site you agree to accept these cookies. More info on our privacy.