Sector 2, General One : 63E, 137C (5 sec longer fight)
Sector 2, General One : 63E, 137C (5 sec longer fight)
Did 11k simulations of that Mussa and in 2% (226 of 11000 to be excat) the outcomes I got a 80 seconds fight vs 1.8% (198 of 11k) for 70E 128C
Personally I go with 72E 128C (80 sec in 0,11% or 12 11K simulations)
You may just increase the avr time by your setup, but personally I don't really care about avr time, I care about minimum time and the frequenzy of that, mainly because 80 sec here means that unless you timed sending out generals perfectly, that said block fails and you loose all the units.
Because 80 seconds block basically comes to a failed block, I played around with numbers and figured that [76E 124C] is the most optimal I can come to.
In 11k simulations I got 0 80 seconds fights and only 0.81% 100 seconds fights. (89 of 11k) which is now what I'm going to plan for using in the future.
Numbers from http://www.thesettlersonlinewiki.com/combat-sim/
Last edited by Vopicus; 01.09.15 at 05:22.
Hmmmm ..... i came to differenrt results: Mussa did not suggest [70E and 128C], but [63E and 137 Cav] That last one gives an outcome of 100 seconds 100% of the time according to this calculator with (99999 repettions) Dit that 10 times.... so a 100% out of 999 990 repetititions. Best option to my humble opinion.Originally Posted by Vopicus
Mussa wrote sector 2, not second block (and he also wrote general one, not general two), so I assumed we're talking about the camp which is camp A in your setup.
The [70E 128C] is the number you put in, in your and hurricanes guide - not Mussa's hence the 'vs'. I included it as I assumed this was the setup Mussa suggested improving.
Here's the attack with the simulator you use
http://www.settlerscombatsimulator.c.../0_Cavalry=137
However if you are right about what camp Mussa was suggesting the block for, I would point out that your own setup 144C 39E would make the block last 100 seconds in 0.18% of the cases and 120 or more in 99.82% of the cases.
Hence a block that last 100 seconds 100% of the time and more than 100 seconds 0% of the time, would hardly be an improvement as I see it.
(I use 36E 153C for the same camp which last 100 seconds in 0.02% of the cases (actually 2 of 11k so slightly less but) and 120 or longer in 99,98% of the cases.
Last edited by Vopicus; 01.09.15 at 17:58.
Yes, i made some mistakes there, soz
Thanks to vopicus aditions there is my second try: Average loss 394R
http://i.imgur.com/v9D4BXi.jpg
improvement suggestions on this one are very much appreciated.
And does anyone know an image host, where you can upload an image that can exceed 10MB limit a little bit?
(Last tweek 7 september)
Last edited by JaJaJaNo; 07.09.15 at 20:42. Reason: corrections
nice overall work thanks mates. did anyone found a better S2 B2 (4: 100R 39E) block. having problems with that one and cant find another block any where. thanks again for the RB work.
I did lots of RB lately lord_vv but never lost that block. the bars goes down all the time but final attack alway finsih before block bar is half way.
hi mategetting some lag or im just tired of RB's lol . Maybe its a sign to start optimizing BK for next event and game fase :/
Lag's always an issue and the 100R 39E block is defenitly a tight one (I havn't found a better one myself), however it does work, and if you are using your own setup on MMA rather than the 185R 35K one you're making the block even safer, so while I don't have a solution to making the block longer, using your own suggestion for the attack will at least lower the time it takes finishing the tower, at least that puts you 10 seconds more on the safe side.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
