This is just rude.
And it is not improved through repetition.
Without a solid collection of citations that
significantly outnumber actual attempts to point out possible flaws or difficulties in the system and suggest improvements it comes much closer to flaming than to anything even remotely constructive.
Everyone is pretty clear at this point that larger guilds are generally pleased, no-one is arguing that. However, the attitude that appears to be rising here is that everything is peachy for everyone and if anyone disagrees with that it's time to break out the spitballs.
It seems it would be better for the game, and the community as a whole, if the successes in the update could be acknowledged
as well as the areas in need of further work.
~
It's interesting seeing how the fora of different language versions are approaching the changes, for example .net, the US/North American version seen to be trying to weigh the costs/benefits overall and for guilds of all sizes, the Germans are filling thread after thread with mountains of feedback and both DE and France have a thread dedicated to looking at specific difficulties with individual quests.
Trying to get a view of the thing as a whole is worthwhile, a dedicated thread for specific issues with specific quests might help with that.