Simulator updated for new generals

[FastSimTSOmaps]

Hi, I have updated my simulator http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsim.php?LangCode=2 to support the new generals.

Best regards.

[Thejollyone]

this is much appreciated, as always thank you

[vigabrand]

+1

[ChapterIX]

Nusala seems to simulate with 160 and not 165 when I tried It out. Did anybody else see that? Also, Vargus protecting vulnerable targets.. During some suggested attacks I was surprised at what was being suggested. Is it working 100%?

Horseback 170 recruits +10 Crossbowman for example.. It's reporting losses of weaker targets.

Other that that, it's encouraging - nice work!

[WanaBSettler]

cool stuff thanx for the hard work!!

[sk_setttler]

I think there is something wrong with Vargus implementation in Combat Sim.

Please check this results:

http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsi...=80&E_1_138=80

vs.

http://www.thesettlersonlinewiki.com...?simref=EDa3yB

[FastSimTSOmaps]

I think there is something wrong with Vargus implementation in Combat Sim.

Please check this results:

http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsi...=80&E_1_138=80

vs.

http://www.thesettlersonlinewiki.com...?simref=EDa3yB

Fixed, thanks for the advice.

[Elldar]

Hi, when I ran this simulation for Vargus http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsi...5=60&E_1_35=10

However, my result when trying was 56R+40C losses. I think the attack order of Vargus and the cavs you have, are wrong. I believe Vargus attack first then your cavs in the simulator, however when watching the attack replay, you see that your cav attack before Vargus. This would only make a difference, on this camp where Vargus actually hit the weaker target (opponents cav) first.

# For clarification - I want to make myself perfectly clear.
How it looks like in replay, with Vargus 60C+.. , 60E + 60LB + 60C +10K camp on bk:
First strike 1 - Your cavs hits opponents cavs (killing them all),
First strike 2 - Vargus hits opponents elites
First strike 3 - opponents cavs hits your recruit (intercept ability from Vargus)
...

In the sim, with just 60 cavs it look likes this: http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsi...5=60&E_1_35=10

The only reason I think that one would get this result is if:
First strike 1 - Vargus attacks opponents cavs + splash on elites
First strike 2 - Your cavs attacks opponents LB (no cavs left)
First strike 3 - Opponent cavs hit your cav (since I made an 60c attack only...)
...

I hope it got more explicit with this clarification. Thanks in advance and keep up the good work.

[FastSimTSOmaps]

i will take a look tomorrow in the morning, best regards and happy new year

[FastSimTSOmaps]

I have added a Combat Log to the results, now you can check the combat fully . I will check what you say but yes in my sim vargus attacks first. In this case i would need to change the combat order. Probably also for MMA (I will check all generals).

Best regards.

Hi, when I ran this simulation for Vargus http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsi...5=60&E_1_35=10

However, my result when trying was 56R+40C losses. I think the attack order of Vargus and the cavs you have, are wrong. I believe Vargus attack first then your cavs in the simulator, however when watching the attack replay, you see that your cav attack before Vargus. This would only make a difference, on this camp where Vargus actually hit the weaker target (opponents cav) first.

# For clarification - I want to make myself perfectly clear.
How it looks like in replay, with Vargus 60C+.. , 60E + 60LB + 60C +10K camp on bk:
First strike 1 - Your cavs hits opponents cavs (killing them all),
First strike 2 - Vargus hits opponents elites
First strike 3 - opponents cavs hits your recruit (intercept ability from Vargus)
...

In the sim, with just 60 cavs it look likes this: http://settlersonlinemaps.com/fastsi...5=60&E_1_35=10

The only reason I think that one would get this result is if:
First strike 1 - Vargus attacks opponents cavs + splash on elites
First strike 2 - Your cavs attacks opponents LB (no cavs left)
First strike 3 - Opponent cavs hit your cav (since I made an 60c attack only...)
...

I hope it got more explicit with this clarification. Thanks in advance and keep up the good work.