why you force us to play co-op adventure, where to find people to play co-op adventure that often.
and same adventure three times... with high cost considering the player level.
I do not mind to play solo adventure even it hard, but co-op x3 is just plain stupied within the window time of 1 week.
Originally Posted by Yuiri
I want to add my voice to the obviously very valid point raised by the players I quote and by many others in this thread, and many others in game who wont take the time to come here and offer feedback - I think lots of us are feeling extremely aggravated, cheated even, by this last update. For those who can try them, at least... Many having bugs with them. And oh gosh, how I wish I was one, retrospectively.
Like many, I was very excited and looking forward to the weekly challenges as they were described to us in the dev diary. It all very quickly turned into stupor, then disappointment, then irritation (to say the least...). First, I (we) realized how costy those quests were getting, as ressources and handing over troops go. But let's say it's still fine. But THEN after being that much committed with all ressources previously invested, then we are asked to do three times 2 differents addys... on a list of... one addy each time. In which world is a single item "a list of items"?. And yes, like said above, Heart of the Woods is one of them, addy which is nowhere to be found, asked by many players at the same time in TO, is reported in wiki as having 1% chance to drop in medium adv search...
I'm baffled. Is it lack of thinking from the Dev? Or just a hope to see us spending gems to auto complete those quests? I hope for the first, it would be less devastating for the gaming spirit.
Either way, I'm -like many others- obviously not going to try and do those challenges ever again before (and if...) they are seriously revamped with some thoroughness. And to put it simply, the envy and joy to play the game has taken a serious hit. If I may, if the game is fun and feels quite balanced, that's an incentive to spend some more real money in it - challenges are the exact opposite as they are now. More than challenging, they feel foolish, and a waste of time and ressources. It's obviously far more interesting to simply save up ressources and buy any population-holding buildings, simple noble residences to begin with, for my part, in example. But maybe you were only aiming them at players with completely crowded islands having not much to do with their res? Nah, even such explanation doesnt stand - challenges are available from levels where such thing is absolutely improbable.
Thanks for hearing us out as fast as possible. And to those saying "we" want things handed out to us effortlessly, you are really not getting it at all and obviously not even trying to. These challenges should be playable by everyone putting some effort in them - and they are clearly not, for the time being.
Last edited by Kelza; 21.11.18 at 17:27.
I'm not sure if there is much point to adding to the whinge-fest, so I will limit my comment to a request/suggestion; please can we opt out of weekly challenges, or hide them from the quest list?
Last edited by Xajorkith; 21.11.18 at 20:32.
Weekly Challenges.... W.C.
This stinks for a reason
why are you guys so busy complaining - if you dont like the new weekly quests then just opt out to do them.
yes - good suggestion- it is annoying to look at quests you are never going to do.
As this was new- I wanted to do it no matter how insanely expensive it is. I was thinking that I should try it before deciding. And fine it is expensive but I have a choice to do it or not. I did not check before hand what all the quest was about,- but when I found out after I had given away - a huge lot of elite troops that it took a very long time to make- that final quest was doing 3 ToW I got mad. So mad that I dont think I will do any more of this.
I dont mind doing ToW - but even doing one would require that I had one. Getting one from doing first some woodcutters - then some 2nd or 3rd thief's, might be possible. To have time to do this to get 3 and do them, and also keeping up my day job. It is not a question of how much I want to spent or give. We are over in the category of impossible task. It is not fair to make people give up this huge amount of resources and then make the final quest impossible to do.
This week I can do it because a very nice person helped me out. And I will finish because it is the first time.
Would like to be able to just hide it so I dont need to be reminded of this again. It is waste of time and resources if you are not lucky to have a huge lot stashed up.
If you want people to do this quantity of follow ups- you need to increase the drop rate of them or to make it possible to get them in merchant.
If for some reason support feels the need to edit what I wrote, please delete entire post instead, dont put words into my mouth that I never said.
Agreed. Another devolution.
Sorry, but I've slept since then...
As far as being required to do adventures I agree that if it's part of a chain that by design you can't see forward in, and have already committed enough resources that it's a waste to give up now, forcing a single choice multi play adventure is a terrible idea and I can't believe anybody thought otherwise. Saner ideas are clear in other elements: Play any Arabian Nights, Play any Co-Op, etc. Or perhaps "Play 3 adventures difficulty 6 or higher" or something like that where the challenge is still there but the player can work within what adventures they have, what can be purchased, what can be reasonably traded for, etc. The idea to force a single adventure multiple times regardless of considerations of availability is so crazy I'm stunned it was even considered.
Sorry, but I've slept since then...
I have completed one weekly challenge as I wanted to try it out unfortunately the cost of completing was extremely high and I had to resort to using gems for some of the sections as I would never have been able to complete. I will not be doing another one unless the requirements are reviewed to make them more achievable - I wouldn't want them to be too easy though. I don't do co-op adventures as I prefer to play on my own so find the forcing of these adventures detrimental to play.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote